Skip to main content

week3- Edward Kil- Nanotechnology



This week in Nanotechnology I have learned the process of developing a circuit board. The circuit board is constructed with three layers, Copper, being the most important material within the three layers. Copper is a conductor which acts as a passageway for the electrons. The layers above the coppers helps with the process of masking which aids the masking process for the copper to develop its shape.

For those who are familiar with the new development of circuit boards, it is not a surprise that copper is the main source of tracer within a circuit board. Nowadays, the conventional copper trace is around 35um. And anything smaller can cause a lot of problems due to the molecular structure not being able to support the thinness of the copper trace. This made me ask myself a question relating to Nanotechnology. Can nanotechnology be able to solve this problem? If so how?.

To tackle my question, I had to surf around the vast knowledge of the internet and gather myself some information about materials that were developed in the research of nanotechnology. Throughout my research, I came across the popular invention of  nanotubes created from the carbon molecules. The Carbon tube has many properties that will help tackle the current problems with our modern tracers.

The conventional trace of copper in comparison to the size of a carbon nanotube is drastically different. The average copper trace is about 35um while nanotube can be as thin as 0.3nm. If I were to equate 35um to nm, the result would 35,000nm. This means that a nanotube has the structural ability to hold itself even in such small measurements. This puts the carbon nanotube at an advantage as copper trace often have defects when thinned out too much.

Another important note to take is that carbon nanotubes are actually better at conducting than metals such as copper. In 2009 University of Buffalo has claimed that nanotubes are far more superior to other metallic materials due to its perfection in structure. Copper and metals on the other hand fall short in conductibility due to the imperfections in its molecular structure making the material unpredictable when tested in a microscoping settings.
The Strength and Flex of the nanotube should not be ignored when looking for alternative dependency from copper trace. The strength of a nanotube is stronger than steel it self. Because of the carbon structure (hexagonal formation), the structure can easily distribute even force throughout the structure. Nonetheless, due to its structure, flexibility is also a property that engineers can now use to their advantage. Copper on the other hand is more malleable than flexible which restricts the use of copper traces on flat surfaces. However, Nanotube can now be used to help create a new platform.

If innovative thinkers spend the time thinking about the advantages of Nanotubes, it could really create a new age for technology. Image a circuit board not being restricted to a flat surface but maybe cylindrical. Or maybe a circuit board that is flexible with nanotubes being integrated into it allowing for flexible devices or even artificial organs. The possibility is endless for the innovative minds that are willing to reach further and tackle new problems.





Works Cited
"Carbon Nanotubes Are Superior To Metals For Electronics, According to Engineers." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 28 Mar. 2009. Web.
"CNT Technology Overview." What Are Carbon Nanotubes? N.p., n.d. Web.
How It's Made: Circuit Boards. How It's Made. N.p., 1 June 2007. Web.
Johnson, Todd. "Learn How Carbon Fiber Tubes Are Made." ThoughtCo. N.p., n.d. Web.
"Scanning the Properties of Nanotubes." Properties of Carbon Nanotubes. Hawk's Perch Technical Writing, n.d. Web.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Week 8 Post- Regenerative

For this weeks Nano Tech, I decided to research on self regenerating nano material with the combination of stem cell research for prosthetic purposes. I decided this idea would be interesting as I see many articles and innovation about the single topic listed above, but never the combination to cater to the prosthetic users. Over the past years, many popular media has shun interested in prosthetic robotic limbs. We will see from time to time, a movie/ game character who has a robotic limb that he or she can control through the use of technology. Most likely by connecting the nervous system to a computer system that recognizes the instructions from the brain. But I have been wondering if that is really the route we should aim for. To propose my idea, I must say that as of yet, this idea seems to be far from reach. There is yet many problems to solve to this day in the stem cell and nanotechnology studies. But what if there can, one day, be a prosthetic that does not require th...

Week-5 Post NanoTech.

This week in Nanotechnology, we had study the idea of hydrophobic materials. The idea that nature has provided for scientist to be inspired by. This in return has allowed Scientist to study the molecular structures to help them better understand why some materials are hydrophobic. In recent years Scientist have discovered that the idea of hydrophobic qualities and how to incorporate them into the field of nanotechnology. Some inventions such as the Never Wet sprays coats a layer of hydrophobic chemical allows for an object to be waterproof or even dirt proof. The image above is can show an example of these types of sprays. Just apply the spray and get wet. So I thought to myself, about the application of hydrophobic sprays and how I can bring an addition that no one has thought of.  It made me realize that none of these hydrophobic sprays were geared towards human protection. Just clothes, windshield or maybe a phone. My mother is a chef at her own restaura...